Housing Policy

Rough sleepers aren't on the map: how housing policy misses women

The data nobody's counting

When the government's official rough sleeping snapshot is taken each night, it captures people bedded down on streets. It's straightforward to measure. But homelessness isn't always straightforward, and neither is the people it affects.

Four years of research from the Women's Rough Sleeping Census has exposed a significant gap in how we understand and respond to rough sleeping in the UK. The numbers are stark: in 2025 alone, the census identified 162 women sleeping rough across six local authority areas where the government's official count recorded zero. That's 162 invisible people, rendered out of sight by a system designed to find one type of rough sleeper and missing everyone else.

On average, the census finds as many as 10 times more women sleeping rough than government snapshots suggest. This isn't a matter of statistical quibbling. It fundamentally changes what we think we know about homelessness in Britain and who's being left behind.

Where are they really sleeping?

The reason for this massive undercount is revealing. In 2025, 65% of women reported sleeping rough in ways the government's current definition simply doesn't recognise. They're sleeping in libraries during opening hours. They're spending nights on public transport, riding the routes until dawn. They're in A&E waiting rooms, in friends' cars, walking the streets all night rather than settling anywhere.

These are transient, hidden forms of rough sleeping. They're no less real, no less dangerous, and no less the sign of a person with nowhere safe to go. Yet most outreach teams aren't looking for them. Services are commissioned and resourced around street-based, bedded-down rough sleeping. The infrastructure simply isn't there to find women in these concealed situations.

Lucy Campbell, assistant director of system change at the Single Homeless Project charity, puts the problem plainly: finding women is only the first hurdle. The next is providing safe, accessible, sustainable housing.

Why this matters for housing policy

The UK property sector and housing providers work within policy frameworks. When those frameworks are built on incomplete data, the results ripple outward. If rough sleepers aren't being found, they can't be offered accommodation. They can't access the services designed to help them transition into stable housing.

The prime minister's ambition to offer "everyone who needs it" a route off the streets by Christmas is well intentioned. But it depends on finding everyone first. If half the population of rough sleepers isn't on the radar, the goal becomes unachievable almost by definition.

This also has implications for housing supply and planning. As councils and housing associations respond to government commitments around rough sleeping, they're planning based on official figures. If those figures are systematically wrong, provision will be undersized from the start.

The safety dimension

There's another layer to this that goes beyond data collection. Women sleeping rough face specific vulnerabilities. The accommodation offered must actively protect rather than inadvertently compound existing risk.

Putting a woman with experience of rough sleeping into a hostel designed for mixed-gender occupancy or shared facilities without trauma-informed support can create new problems rather than solving the existing one. Safety, dignity and autonomy matter. Generic beds in generic accommodation aren't always the answer.

What needs to change

Outreach teams need to be resourced differently. That means funding for staff trained in identifying hidden homelessness. It means understanding why women might avoid traditional services. It means meeting people where they are, literally and metaphorically.

It also means housing solutions that reflect the reality of women's needs rather than treating rough sleeping as a uniform problem with one solution.

Housing providers and local authorities should audit their own outreach capacity. Are your teams equipped to find people who aren't visibly on the street? If not, what's preventing that change?

For those involved in housing advocacy or policy, the Women's Rough Sleeping Census provides hard evidence that current systems are failing. It's a call to redesign how we find people and how we house them once found.

Getting everyone in means actually finding everyone first.

An error has occurred. This application may no longer respond until reloaded. Reload 🗙